3   AT GARDENCROFT

  

WHAT IS GARDENCROFT?


BIGBROTHER 2 ALL THE STORIES & NAUGHTY PICS


BIGBROTHER 1 THE ORIGINAL FULL ARCHIVE & PICS


BBC CASTAWAY 2000 ALL THE LATEST NEWS AND GOSSIP REGULAR UPDATES 


RICHARD BRANSON AND BILL GATES LOTTERY


BALLISTIC MISSILES ON THE ISLE OF WIGHT?


INTO V.W.BEETLES & CAMPERS? TRY THIS!


PREGNANT? PLANNING A BABY? BUNDLE OF JOY ALREADY HERE? TRY THE GARDENCROFT PREGNANCY WEBSITE


I WORK IN BIRMINGHAM'S JEWELLRY QUARTER SEE WHAT WE DO FOR A LIVING!


in association with

 
Learning to love Big Brother

A third series of Big Brother is under way and, despite herself, our critic is again transfixed. But then it is one of the wonders of our modern age
To paraphrase Lady Bracknell: “To enjoy one series of Big Brother is misfortune, to watch two is carelessness, but to be this excited about Big Brother 3 means that you got problems, lady.”

And indeed, I have got problems. I am fully aware that while the nation treated the first two series of Big Brother as the frolicking of televisual innocents, Big Brother 3 has the slight suggestion of sadness about it – as if Channel 4 is still going out and pulling the same dim blondes it used to hang around with when it was 17, while the other channels have moved on to a sensible brunette who gets on with their mother.

If we have learnt nothing from putting random dolts in a televisual Petri dish twice before, why repeat the experiment a third time? And doesn’t this enjoying of trashy television, and revelling in its kitschy awfulness, make us like students stealing traffic cones to “decorate” their horrible rooms?

Underneath it all, they’d like a couple of nice prints and a leather sofa from Liberty’s, and we’d like The Blue Planet and re-runs of Brideshead Revisited, but we’ve all got to make do with what we’ve got. On top of all of this, given that we are all in agreement that the people who enter Big Brother are among the most psychologically grotesque on Earth, are we not, in watching them, little better than Michael Elphick when he’s laughing at the Elephant Man in The Elephant Man?

In short, in coming back for a Big Brother hat trick, I feel I have unknowingly made the transition from child-like eccentric to cat-hoarding bag lady in the eyes of normal Britain. I’ve taken it too far. I’m doing wrong. I have the morals of a codfish. But then, I can’t believe something that feels this good could be so bad.

When the theme-tune struck up last Friday night for the first time in nine months, I cried the same kind of excited tears that I did in 24 when Jack Bauer shot Nina in the flak-jacket. Half-way through meeting the new contestants, I got so hysterical that I had to lie under the rug and get Charlie to hit me with the phone until I shut up, and after the programme ended on Channel 4, we watched live coverage on E4 until 5.30am — which compares quite badly to my 12.30am bedtime on the millennium, when we had 20 guests over and everything. Clearly I am going to have to come up with a great many excuses for why I am so enthralled by something that could easily be dismissed as the DNA splicing of a peep show and a special school.

Except there are no excuses necessary, because in the end a deeper truth will set me free. I believe that Big Brother is, contrary to everything you may have assumed, one of the most remarkable indices of human progress in our history. Indeed, so urgent is my need to explain why Big Brother is as great a marker of human progress as universal suffrage, the NHS and the smooth-action retractable cup-holder on recent makes of Saab, I have compiled a list.

1. Much has been made of the “price” of Big Brother fame: ten weeks of unavoidable public nudity and humiliation in exchange for what? At best, a couple of Sun front pages and the occasional appearance on Channel 5’s karaoke show Night Fever. It’s exploitation, pure and simple.

I tell you something, though, our grandmothers would have thought that luxury. Your nan and my nan would have had to be flat on their backs on a casting couch for weeks for even a mention on the gossip pages. They would have had to work their way around every director’s office in London on their knees in order to sing Robert De Niro’s Waiting on a karaoke show in front of a potential audience of 0.4 million.

Contrary to accusations of exploitation, I actually think it’s a mark of societal progress that these women’s grandchildren have to do little more than wee in front of a hidden camera crew and overcome a phobia of chickens in order to be in with a chance of releasing a flop Christmas single.

2. It stops genuinely talented people from killing themselves. We are a gossiping breed — those copies of Heat and The National Enquirer don’t get blown off the newsstands by the wind, and we need a certain number of people in the public eye to mildly obsess about. Before Big Brother, the only candidates for obsession were people who’d come into the public eye under the power of some kind of talent or likeability. Often, the glare of publicity would ruin the very quality that brought them to prominence in the first place and, distraught, they would kill themselves. But, admittedly, no example springs to mind at present.

With Big Brother, however, we now have 12 ultimately expendable people a year who volunteer themselves for the rather unpleasant task of being publicly dissected in minute psychological detail, in lieu of someone with more palpable skills. Rather than Channel 4 taking advantage of some desperate media wannabes, I see this more on a par with certain systems in Scandinavia, where citizens spend a few weeks a year doing community paperwork on bicycle thefts, to ease the burden on proper coppers, who concentrate on murders and stuff.

3. Morality wise, on its worst level, Big Brother is only as bad as a single man seeing a well-paid and willing prostitute. Sure, if we could, we’d love to spy on 12 exhibitionists locked in a house for ten weeks within the context of a loving and equal relationship, but we still hadn’t found the right people on the dinner-party circuit and we had these urges.

Besides, Big Brother gives as well as takes. When Nasty Nick was cheating, Helen was unfaithfulling with Paul and Mel was putting it about, people who usually do little more on a Friday night than fight with a cousin in a car park were suddenly having intense and involved pub conversations about comparative ethics. I well remember hearing one beefy, tattooed man in a pub on Holloway Road standing up and shouting, “But Helen loves him!” Eat that, The Moral Maze.

4. It has normalised varieties of race, sexuality and behaviour. Before Big Brother, Britain had never seen a poof in his jim-jams making bread. Likewise, despite 30 years of well-meaning equal opportunities, I had never seen a black man put a chicken on a seesaw, or an Asian woman dance badly to her own, badly whistled version of Janet Jackson’s Nasty Boy.

When we no doubt finally see the first Big Brother incident of The Sex, it will be the first example of two people who genuinely fancy each other having some vaguely affectionate, normal sex on television. That we have left something so important to be accomplished as the by-product of someone’s ambition to sing Robert De Niro’s Waiting on Channel 5 is an astonishing oversight.

Maybe we were all just subconsciously waiting for the advent of Big Brother 3 contestant Spencer, who has buttocks so perfect I believe an act of sex involving him would come under the heading of “A Piece of Art of World Importance”, and would cause the more finely tuned among us to cry.

5. Of course, if there was no Big Brother lending counter-weight to the World Cup overkill this year, we would be staring at the prospect of the world’s first Women and Gays Riot straight in its mad, desperate, unseeing eyes.

These days, it is neither religion nor opiates that are the opiates of the masses, but the constant reassuring flicker of E4 showing live coverage of a woman in trackie bottoms using a carpet sweeper while 11 other bored housemates smoke cigarettes and watch her. So-oo soothing.

Indeed, the only way I can see out of the impending Third World War is if Channel 4 quickly syndicates the show to India and Pakistan, allowing them to unite in order to defeat their real foe — dull, drippy, do-nothing Lynne. And if they should suddenly launch an unprecedented nuclear attack on her, well, with my regular text updates from the Big Brother website, I won’t miss out on any of the action.

Caitlin's guide to the housemates

Lynne
A dull Hibernian creature. Like watching paint remain wet.

 

Sunita
Precious. “As a barrister, I don’t really want to play that game.” She left. We were thankful.

 

Jonny
This wearisome Geordie throwback has repugnant athlete’s foot. Inexplicably 6-1 on for winning.

 

Alison
A cackling, sub-Rusty Lee vexation. Thinks junkies go “cold chicken”. Ate all the defrosted ice-cream.

 

PJ
Not much going on here. Likes innuendo. Looks like a thumb.

 

Lee
Not much going on here. Apparently has a body-fat index of 13 per cent. Looks like a bigger thumb.

 

Kate
Guess which half of the population likes this flirty blonde in tiny shorts?

Adele
Inexplicably normal and nice. Wants to be a DJ.

 

Jade
Represents a good bet for future entertainment. “What’s a ‘paragus?’” she asked, reading the labels in the vegetable garden.

 

Alex
Posh ex-model, hasn’t been able to go to the lavatory since entering the house.

 

Spencer
Sulky totty from Cambridge. Needs to get out more.

 

Sandy
Battered bear of a man. The brains, heart and kilt of Big Brother 3.

 

MORE STORIES ATGARDENCROFT BB3 HOMEPAGE

 

BIG BROTHER IS A PRODUCTION FOR CHANNEL